Coverart for item
The Resource Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015

Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015

Label
Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015
Title
Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015
Creator
Contributor
Subject
Language
eng
Member of
Cataloging source
MiAaPQ
Literary form
non fiction
Nature of contents
dictionaries
Series statement
Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration Ser.
Series volume
v.1
Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015
Label
Yearbook of International Sports Arbitration 2015
Link
http://libproxy.rpi.edu/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rpi/detail.action?docID=4722686
Publication
Copyright
Related Contributor
Related Location
Related Agents
Related Authorities
Related Subjects
Related Items
Carrier category
online resource
Carrier category code
cr
Carrier MARC source
rdacarrier
Color
multicolored
Content category
text
Content type code
txt
Content type MARC source
rdacontent
Contents
  • Preface -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Part I General Articles -- 1 Assessing the Usefulness and Legitimacy of CAS -- Abstract -- 1.1 Introduction -- 1.2 The Role of International Federations -- 1.3 The Behaviour of Supporters of the Accused -- 1.4 Future Directions -- 2 The Influence of Common Law Traditions on the Practice and Procedure Before the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) -- Abstract -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The Origins of Common Law and Its Historical Development -- 2.3 The Modern Influence of Common Law on Legal Thinking and the Principle of Stare Decisis -- 2.4 The CAS and Its Procedure -- 2.4.1 Origins and Historical Development -- 2.4.2 The Reforms of 1994 -- 2.4.3 The Significance of the Code -- 2.5 Common Law or Civil Law? -- 2.5.1 Binding or Persuasive Authority? -- 2.5.2 The CAS Standard of Proof as an Example of a Practising Common Law Tradition -- 2.6 Conclusion -- References -- 3 The Validity of Analytical Science in Anti-doping-A Scientific and Legal Challenge -- Abstract -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 The Lallukka CAS Award: The Latest Instalment in the hGH Trilogy -- 3.2.1 The Positive Test -- 3.2.2 National-Level Proceedings -- 3.2.3 CAS Proceedings -- 3.2.3.1 The Anti-doping Rule Violation -- 3.2.3.2 The Sanction -- 3.3 Background of the hGH Trilogy -- 3.3.1 Challenges for Anti-doping Science -- 3.3.2 The hGH Trilogy Before CAS Panels on the Decision Limits in the Isoform Test -- 3.3.3 The hGH Isoform Test After WADA v. Lallukka: A Closed Debate or a Need for Rethinking the System? -- 3.4 Attributing a Legal Status to Scientific Issues Under the WADA Code Regime -- 3.4.1 Threshold Substance, Non-threshold Substance, or{u2026}.? -- 3.4.2 What Legal Implications Do the Decision Limits Have in Practice? -- 3.4.3 Need for Adapting the Legal Framework to Evolving Realities? -- 3.5 Expert Evidence Before CAS Panels
  • 3.5.1 Importance of Expert Evidence in Doping Disputes -- 3.5.2 Who Acts as an Expert Before CAS? -- 3.5.3 Assessing Expert Evidence -- 3.5.4 Pitfalls to Be Avoided in Dealing with Science and Experts -- 3.5.5 Financial Aid for Athletes on Scientific Matters? -- 3.6 Conclusion-Outlook Beyond 2015 -- References -- 4 The Sell-on Clause in Football: Recent Cases and Evolutions -- Abstract -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The Sell-on Clause in Football Transfer Contracts -- 4.2.1 Conditions and Peculiarities -- 4.2.2 Recent FIFA and CAS Jurisprudence -- 4.2.2.1 Interpretation Issues: 'Transfer-Transfer Fee' -- 4.2.2.2 Sell-on Clause in Combination with 'Participation Agreement' -- 4.3 Case Commentary: CAS 2014A3508-Areas of Dispute -- 4.3.1 Factual and Procedural Background -- 4.3.2 Decision of the Panel -- 4.3.3 Commentary -- 4.3.3.1 Interpretation Principles -- 4.3.3.2 Aims and Conditions of the Sell-on Clause -- 4.3.3.3 The Simulated Transfer -- 4.3.3.4 Sell-on Fee-Calculation Basis -- 4.4 Sell-on Fees and Third Party Ownership (TPO) -- 4.5 Conclusion -- Reference -- 5 CAS Provisional and Conservatory Measures and Other Options to Be Granted Interim Legal Relief -- Abstract -- 5.1 Introductory Remarks -- 5.2 Criteria for Granting CAS Provisional and Conservatory Measures -- 5.2.1 Overview -- 5.2.2 Procedural Requirements -- 5.2.2.1 Time Limit -- 5.2.2.2 Exhaustion of Remedies Before Sports Federation or Body -- 5.2.2.3 Security -- 5.2.2.4 Expedited Measures -- 5.2.2.5 "Stay of Execution" -- 5.2.3 Substantial Criteria for Granting Provisional Measures -- 5.2.3.1 Irreparable Harm -- 5.2.3.2 Likelihood of Success on the Merits -- 5.2.3.3 Balance of Interests -- 5.3 Enforcement of CAS Provisional and Conservatory Measures -- 5.4 Waiver of State Courts' Jurisdiction?-Parallel Competence of State Courts -- 5.5 Appeals Against Provisional Measures
  • 5.6 Provisional Measures in the Swiss Federal Tribunal -- 5.7 Concluding Remarks -- References -- 6 The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal-An Overview of Its Process and Decisions -- Abstract -- 6.1 Introduction -- 6.2 BAT Arbitration-How Does It Work? -- 6.2.1 BAT Arbitration in a Nutshell -- 6.2.2 BAT Proceedings-Step by Step -- 6.2.3 The Applicable Law and the Making of the Award -- 6.2.4 Remedies Against BAT Awards -- 6.2.5 The Enforcement of BAT Awards -- 6.3 BAT Arbitration-What Does It Mean? -- 6.3.1 Deciding Sports Disputes Ex Aequo et Bono -- 6.3.2 Examples from the BAT Case Law -- 6.3.2.1 The Concept of "Guaranteed no-Cut Contracts" -- 6.3.2.2 Common Grounds for Termination -- 6.3.2.3 The Requirement to Give Notice -- 6.3.2.4 Immediate Termination -- 6.3.2.5 Termination in Relation to the Specific Breach Relied upon -- 6.3.2.6 Ancillary Claims -- 6.3.2.7 The Duty to Mitigate and Other Defences -- References -- Part II Commentaries of CAS Awards -- 7 CAS 2013A3365 Juventus FC v. Chelsea FC and CAS 2013A3366 A.S. Livorno Calcio S.p.A. v. Chelsea FC, Award of 21 January 2015 -- Abstract -- 7.1 Facts and Procedure of the Case -- 7.2 Interpreting Article 14(3) FIFA RSTP with a Little Help of EU Law -- 7.2.1 Contractual or Quasi-statutory Interpretation? -- 7.2.2 EU Law as a Decisive Contextual Element to Interpret the FIFA RSTP -- 7.3 Beyond the Mutu Case: How Much Contractual Stability is Compatible with EU Law? -- 7.4 Conclusion: Interpretation Matters! -- References -- 8 CAS 2014A3486, MFK Dubnica V. FC Parma, Award of 2 February 2015 -- Abstract -- 8.1 Facts and Procedure -- 8.1.1 The Parties -- 8.1.2 The Facts -- 8.1.3 The Arguments -- 8.1.3.1 Dubnica's Arguments -- 8.1.3.2 Parma's Arguments -- 8.1.4 The Law -- 8.1.5 The Merits -- 8.1.5.1 The Exclusion of Evidence Pursuant to Article R57(3) CAS Code
  • 8.1.5.2 Was Dubnica Entitled to Receive Training Compensation from Parma? -- 8.1.5.3 Did the Player Complete His Training Prior to His Registration with Parma? -- 8.1.5.4 To What Amount of Training Compensation Was Dubnica Entitled, if Any? -- 8.2 Commentary -- 8.2.1 The Exclusion of Evidence Based on Article R57(3) CAS Code -- 8.2.2 The Requirement to Submit a Contract Offer by Registered Mail -- 8.2.3 When Has the Player's Training Ended? -- 8.3 Conclusion -- References -- 9 TAS 2011A2578, OGC Nice Côte d'Azur & Yannick Dos Santos Djalo v. FIFA, Order on Provisional Measures of 11 October 2011 and CAS 2013A3647, Sporting Clube de Portugal SAD v. OGC Nice Côte d'Azur & CAS 2013A3648, OGC Nice Côte d'Azur v. Sporting Clube de -- Abstract -- 9.1 Facts -- 9.2 TAS 2011A2578-Request for Provisional Measures -- 9.2.1 Request -- 9.2.2 Argumentation by the Parties -- 9.2.3 Assessment by the Panel -- 9.2.4 Commentary -- 9.3 CAS 2013A3647 Sporting V. OGC Nice & CAS 2013A3648 OGC Nice V. Sporting & FIFA -- 9.3.1 Events Following the Request for Provisional Measures -- 9.3.2 Argumentation by the Parties -- 9.3.2.1 Sporting -- 9.3.2.2 OGC Nice -- 9.3.3 Assessment by the Panel -- 9.3.3.1 Intention of the Parties Prompting the Conditions Precedent -- 9.3.3.2 Did OGC Nice Fail to Take the Necessary Actions to Trigger the Condition? -- 9.3.3.3 Bad Faith by OGC Nice? -- 9.3.4 Damages -- 9.3.4.1 General -- 9.3.4.2 Contributory Negligence? -- 9.3.5 Commentary -- Reference -- 10 CAS 2014A3832 & 3833, Vanessa Vanakorn v. Fédération Internationale de Ski (FIS), Award of 19 June 2015 -- Abstract -- 10.1 Introduction -- 10.2 Case History and Context -- 10.3 Facts and Procedure -- 10.4 Parties' Submissions and Arguments -- 10.5 Panel's Rationale and Award -- 10.6 Commentary and Conclusion -- References
  • 11 CAS 2015A3874, Football Association of Albania v. UEFA & Football Association of Serbia, Award of 10 July 2015 and CAS 2015A3875, Football Association of Serbia v. UEFA, Award of 10 July 2015 -- Abstract -- 11.1 Introduction -- 11.2 Summary of Facts and Procedure -- 11.2.1 Facts -- 11.2.2 Procedure -- 11.3 Comment -- 11.3.1 Case Management: Two Separate CAS Appeal Proceedings -- 11.3.2 Standing to Appeal and the Notion of 'Directly Affected Party' -- 11.3.3 Strict Liability and the Notion of 'Supporter' -- 11.3.4 Host Team's and UEFA's Duties for Order and Security at UEFA Competitions -- 11.3.5 Refusing to Play or Being Responsible for a Match not Being Played in Full -- References -- 12 CAS 2014A3759, Chand v. AFI & IAAF, Award of 24 July 2015 -- Abstract -- 12.1 Introduction -- 12.2 Background -- 12.3 CAS Proceedings -- 12.4 Discussion of the Merits -- 12.4.1 Request for Relief -- 12.4.1.1 CAS Award -- 12.4.1.2 Comments -- 12.4.2 Evidentiary Issues and Deference to the Sports Organization's Discretion -- 12.4.2.1 CAS Award -- 12.4.2.2 Athlete's Position -- 12.4.2.3 IAAF's Position -- 12.4.2.4 The CAS Panel's Analysis -- 12.4.2.5 Comments -- 12.4.2.5.1 Burden and Standard of Proof in Science-Related Domains -- 12.4.2.5.2 Need to Distinguish Evidence on Facts and the Scientific Foundations of a Regulation -- 12.4.2.5.3 Deference of a CAS Panel to Sports Organization's Discretion -- 12.4.3 Scientific Validity, Discrimination, and Proportionality -- 12.4.3.1 CAS Award -- 12.4.3.1.1 Scientific Validity -- 12.4.3.1.2 Discrimination -- 12.4.3.1.3 Proportionality -- 12.4.3.2 Comments -- 12.4.3.2.1 Deference to the Parties' Agreement Beyond the Facts of the Dispute -- 12.4.3.2.2 Artificial Separation Between Scientific Validity and Proportionality Assessment -- 12.4.3.2.3 Failure to Look into the Ultimate Foundations for the Regulations
  • 12.4.4 No Disguised Impermissible Doping Sanction
http://library.link/vocab/cover_art
https://contentcafe2.btol.com/ContentCafe/Jacket.aspx?Return=1&Type=S&Value=9789462651296&userID=ebsco-test&password=ebsco-test
Dimensions
unknown
http://library.link/vocab/discovery_link
{'f': 'http://opac.lib.rpi.edu/record=b4392832'}
Extent
1 online resource (401 pages)
Form of item
online
Isbn
9789462651296
Media category
computer
Media MARC source
rdamedia
Media type code
c
Sound
unknown sound
Specific material designation
remote

Library Locations

    • Folsom LibraryBorrow it
      110 8th St, Troy, NY, 12180, US
      42.729766 -73.682577
Processing Feedback ...